Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CB's avatar

I advise reading Change by Damian Centola on this topic which adresses why the Black Lives Matter movement took off when it did. Why was there a big reaction at one point when many similar cases before failed ? Just having the slogan and the specific case wasn't enough.

One element is the network of connections between people. There were many people who allowed to do the connection and exchange of informations between local activists, the black community in the US, social justice people, journalists...

Expand full comment
EvolvingRichie's avatar

I support the Black Lives Matter movement, and agree with most of this article, but I am a little skeptical of some of the claims here:

Particularly, I think the claim that Black Lives Matter is a successful *worldwide* movement is dubious. I think the movement has been very successful in the US, but I think that the message doesn't translate that well to other countries. I'm willing to bet that if you polled a representative sample of Europeans, most of them would think that the campaign is primarily about US police killing US black people and nothing more. Has anyone done this? I'm not really sure that the campaign actually has been hugely successful in framing police violence as a symptom of a wider systemic issue.

In my experience, the only people who actually understand the Black Lives Matter campaign properly are American Liberals and far left people from non-US countries. In my experience, everyone else, including moderate lefties in the UK, seem to misunderstand the movement. A lot of people reject it based on ideas they have about the movement that are not actually accurate.

On their messaging, I agree it communicates a clear demand, but I am not sure it communicates a clear vision or names the struggle. I think people get that a big aspect of it is police unfairly killing black people. I don't think the messaging really communicates to others that this is just one manifestation of wider systemic racism. Think about times when you have tried to discuss BLM with others in a non-US country: have you ever encountered the dismissive response, "Yeah, it's terrible! The police in America are really rotten and need fixing!", which of course misses the wider point.

When it comes to commnicating a clear vision, the main case I'm thinking of is the fact that lots of people seem to find the "All Lives Matter" framing and slogan very appealing. As many people have pointed out, "All Lives Matter" is not a constructive slogan and totally misses the point. However, it is undeniably appealing to broad swaths of the public, and crucially, many who might otherwise hold anti-racist attitudes. Among BLM supporters, there's this idea that anyone who says "All Lives Matter" is secretly against the anti-racist cause. I think this is oversimplistic, naive and generally comes out of a lack of actually talking to a diverse group of people.

All that said, I do think there's much to learn from the movement, especially slogans ("I can't breathe" gives me chills even now), symbols, and recognisable people. The idea of "effective polarisation" was new to me, super interesting concept I wanna know more about.

Also, while I don't agree with everything in this post, I think that posts like this are utterly vital to the animal movement, and I look forward to each one!

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts